Visa just reframed decentralized finance as onchain finance, presenting itself as the connective tissue between regulated banks and programmable money. In practice, Visa wants to standardize how institutions tap stablecoin liquidity, build credit products, and settle value on public chains. This piece explains what that rebrand actually means, how the proposed lending rails could work, and what governance and custody structures banks would need to adopt right now.
What is “onchain finance” according to Visa
Onchain finance is the institutional packaging of DeFi primitives. It keeps public blockchains and smart contracts for transparency and programmability, but wraps them in bank grade compliance, data reporting, and custody controls. Visa’s framing swaps crypto jargon for operational language that resonates with treasurers, risk teams, and regulators.
How the lending rails could work step by step
- Eligibility and onboarding Institutions integrate with Visa’s data and analytics layer for KYC, risk scoring, and address screening. Approved wallets are whitelisted.
- Funding sources Banks choose between three liquidity pools: a) fiat backed stablecoins in segregated accounts b) tokenized deposits issued by regulated banks c) tokenized funds backed by short term treasuries.
- Credit origination A bank launches a credit facility as a smart contract with predefined underwriting rules. Loan requests flow from approved borrowers and are priced with an oracle fed benchmark rate plus spread.
- Collateral and risk control Collateral lives in qualified custody with programmable escrow and real time monitoring. Margin calls and liquidations are automated by contract logic with human override for abnormal events.
- Settlement and servicing Disbursements and repayments settle in stablecoins or tokenized deposits. Servicing data is streamed to Visa’s analytics layer for reconciliation, reporting, and dispute workflows.
- Compliance and reporting Every state change generates audit trails mapped to existing regulatory reports. Chain addresses are bound to legal entities so supervisors can trace flows end to end.
Issuer Dossier
What Visa is really offering
- Data and analytics for stablecoin flows and risk telemetry.
- Standards and interfaces so banks can originate, service, and report onchain credit without stitching bespoke tooling.
- Ecosystem orchestration connecting custodians, oracles, and identity providers behind a common set of controls.
Where the moat could sit
- Distribution with banks and fintechs, regulatory relationships, and settlement experience. If the rails become the default spec for institutional lending on public chains, vendors will build to those standards.
Competitive landscape
- Card networks and global processors courting tokenized deposits and stablecoins.
- Custody first providers positioning their policy engines as the heart of institutional DeFi.
- Onchain analytics firms that could supply risk views independent of payment networks.
Governance and Custody Blueprint
Control planes you must define from day one
- Key management Roles for issuance, transfer, and admin keys. Hardware security modules plus multi party computation for critical actions.
- Policy engine Allowlists, transfer limits, jurisdiction rules, and incident playbooks encoded as policy rather than code sprawl.
- Data retention and disclosure Mapping onchain events to records management and supervisory reporting timelines.
- Change management Versioned smart contracts with staged rollouts, canary deployments, and emergency pause authority owned by a defined committee.
- Third party risk Contracts and SLAs with custodians, oracle providers, and compliance vendors, including failover arrangements.
Credit models banks can deploy on public chains
| Model | Liquidity source | Collateral style | Primary use case | Pros | Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tokenized deposit credit line | Bank issued tokenized deposits | Secured or unsecured | Off chain core accrual mirrored onchain | Familiar regulatory perimeter and balance sheet treatment | Interoperability across chains may be limited without bridges or standards |
| Stablecoin revolving facility | Segregated fiat backed stablecoin reserves | Over collateralized with tokenized treasuries or blue chip crypto | Smart contract accrual with oracle fed rate | Programmable, composable, near real time settlement | Reserve management and depeg risk must be tightly governed |
| Onchain secured term loan | Pooled institutional liquidity via tokenized funds | Over collateralized with tokenized real world assets | Onchain accrual and waterfall distribution | Asset backed finance and invoice factoring | Transparency for investors, automated servicing |
Visa and onchain finance building blocks
- 2021 to 2023 Pilot stablecoin settlement with selected partners and expand analytics for public chains.
- 2024 Public dashboards and research on stablecoin flows and tokenization progress appear across Visa channels.
- July 2025 Economic institute brief updates the state of stablecoins, CBDCs, and tokenized deposits with institutional language.
- October 2025 Visa formalizes the onchain finance framing and outlines lending rails for banks and fintechs.
This timeline focuses on publicly communicated milestones and research artifacts that preview the current strategy.
Pros and risks of visa onchain finance
Pros
- Translates crypto primitives into bank native language and controls.
- Offers a spec for compliant onchain credit that other vendors can implement.
- Improves auditability and reconciliation with continuous data feeds.
Risks
- Standardization could centralize influence over open protocols.
- Interoperability gaps between chains and custodians can fragment liquidity.
- Legal enforceability of automated actions still depends on jurisdiction and contract design.
Is onchain finance the same as DeFi
Short answer, not exactly. It uses the same building blocks but insists on strong identity, custody segregation, and policy driven controls. The aim is institutional scale finance on public rails rather than retail first experimentation.
How would banks actually lend using stablecoins
Banks would fund facilities with segregated reserves or tokenized deposits, originate loans via smart contracts, and service them with automated schedules. Stablecoins become the settlement medium while traditional credit underwriting remains under bank governance.
Does Visa take custody of customer assets
No. The model relies on qualified custodians and bank balance sheets. Visa positions itself at the standards, data, and orchestration layers, not as the custodian of record.
What to watch next
- Policy standardization for address screening, disclosures, and consumer protections that map onchain events to traditional reporting.
- Tokenized collateral growth especially treasuries and receivables that make secured lending efficient.
- Interbank trials where tokenized deposits and stablecoins interoperate without risky bridges.
- Regulatory clarity on capital treatment and liquidity coverage when loans are originated or settled on public chains.
Conclusion
Visa’s onchain finance reframe is more than a new label. It is a bid to define how banks adopt programmable money with governance, custody, and data pipelines that supervisors will accept. If it succeeds, the lending rails described here could bring stablecoin credit into mainstream corporate finance. For deeper context on institutional custody, tokenized securities safeguards, and enterprise grade mainnet changes, see the internal posts below.
Related Posts
- Ripple expands custody network in Africa with Absa Bank after RLUSD rollout
- Tokenised stocks need real investor safeguards models gaps and the path forward October 2025
- Hedera v066 mainnet upgrade explained and what it changes for builders today
1 Comment
Pingback: The Crypto Tides - Crypto events November 2025